Hebrews 7:11 Now if perfection came through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the law ), what further need was there for another priest...

7:11 CSB

逐节对照

Christian Standard Bible - Now if perfection came through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the law ), what further need was there for another priest to appear, said to be according to the order of Melchizedek and not according to the order of Aaron?
新标点和合本 - 从前百姓在利未人祭司职任以下受律法，倘若藉这职任能得完全，又何用另外兴起一位祭司，照麦基洗德的等次，不照亚伦的等次呢？
和合本2010（上帝版-简体） - 那么，如果百姓藉着利未人的祭司职任能达到完全—因为百姓是在这职分下领受律法的—为什么还需要按照麦基洗德的体系另外兴起一位祭司，而不按照亚伦的体系呢？
和合本2010（神版-简体） - 那么，如果百姓藉着利未人的祭司职任能达到完全—因为百姓是在这职分下领受律法的—为什么还需要按照麦基洗德的体系另外兴起一位祭司，而不按照亚伦的体系呢？
当代译本 - 以色列人在利未祭司制度的基础上承受律法，如果通过这个祭司制度可以达到纯全，又何必照麦基洗德的模式而不是亚伦的模式，另外兴起一位祭司呢？
圣经新译本 - 这样看来，如果藉着利未人的祭司制度能达到完全的地步（人民是在这制度下领受律法的），为什么还需要照着麦基洗德的体系，另外兴起一位祭司，而不照着亚伦的体系呢？
中文标准译本 - 既然如此，如果藉着利未人的祭司职份能达到完全——子民本来在这职份下领受了律法——那么，为什么还需要照着麦基洗德的等级，而不照着所谓“亚伦的等级”兴起另一位祭司呢？
现代标点和合本 - 从前百姓在利未人祭司职任以下受律法，倘若藉这职任能得完全，又何用另外兴起一位祭司，照麦基洗德的等次，不照亚伦的等次呢？
和合本（拼音版） - 从前百姓在利未人祭司职任以下受律法，倘若藉这职任能得完全，又何用另外兴起一位祭司，照麦基洗德的等次，不照亚伦的等次呢？
New International Version - If perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood—and indeed the law given to the people established that priesthood—why was there still need for another priest to come, one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron?
New International Reader's Version - The law that was given to the people called for the priestly system. That system began with Levi. Suppose the priestly system could have made people perfect. Then why was there still a need for another priest to come? And why did he need to be like Melchizedek? Why wasn’t he from Aaron’s family line?
English Standard Version - Now if perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need would there have been for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, rather than one named after the order of Aaron?
New Living Translation - So if the priesthood of Levi, on which the law was based, could have achieved the perfection God intended, why did God need to establish a different priesthood, with a priest in the order of Melchizedek instead of the order of Levi and Aaron?
The Message - If the priesthood of Levi and Aaron, which provided the framework for the giving of the law, could really make people perfect, there wouldn’t have been need for a new priesthood like that of Melchizedek. But since it didn’t get the job done, there was a change of priesthood, which brought with it a radical new kind of law. There is no way of understanding this in terms of the old Levitical priesthood, which is why there is nothing in Jesus’ family tree connecting him with that priestly line.
New American Standard Bible - So if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the Law), what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be designated according to the order of Aaron?
New King James Version - Therefore, if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be called according to the order of Aaron?
Amplified Bible - Now if perfection [a perfect fellowship between God and the worshiper] had been attained through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people were given the Law) what further need was there for another and different kind of priest to arise, one in the manner of Melchizedek, rather than one appointed to the order of Aaron?
American Standard Version - Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron?
King James Version - If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
New English Translation - So if perfection had in fact been possible through the Levitical priesthood – for on that basis the people received the law – what further need would there have been for another priest to arise, said to be in the order of Melchizedek and not in Aaron’s order?
World English Bible - Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
新標點和合本 - 從前百姓在利未人祭司職任以下受律法，倘若藉這職任能得完全，又何用另外興起一位祭司，照麥基洗德的等次，不照亞倫的等次呢？
和合本2010（上帝版-繁體） - 那麼，如果百姓藉着利未人的祭司職任能達到完全－因為百姓是在這職分下領受律法的－為甚麼還需要按照麥基洗德的體系另外興起一位祭司，而不按照亞倫的體系呢？
和合本2010（神版-繁體） - 那麼，如果百姓藉着利未人的祭司職任能達到完全—因為百姓是在這職分下領受律法的—為甚麼還需要按照麥基洗德的體系另外興起一位祭司，而不按照亞倫的體系呢？
當代譯本 - 以色列人在利未祭司制度的基礎上承受律法，如果通過這個祭司制度可以達到純全，又何必照麥基洗德的模式而不是亞倫的模式，另外興起一位祭司呢？
聖經新譯本 - 這樣看來，如果藉著利未人的祭司制度能達到完全的地步（人民是在這制度下領受律法的），為甚麼還需要照著麥基洗德的體系，另外興起一位祭司，而不照著亞倫的體系呢？
呂振中譯本 - 這樣看來，倘若藉着利未人的祭司職分能有完全勝任的資格（而人民之領受了律法倒是以這職分為基本），哪裏還需要另一種的一位祭司興起來、是照麥基洗德的等次、而不稱為照亞倫的等次呢？
中文標準譯本 - 既然如此，如果藉著利未人的祭司職份能達到完全——子民本來在這職份下領受了律法——那麼，為什麼還需要照著麥基洗德的等級，而不照著所謂「亞倫的等級」興起另一位祭司呢？
現代標點和合本 - 從前百姓在利未人祭司職任以下受律法，倘若藉這職任能得完全，又何用另外興起一位祭司，照麥基洗德的等次，不照亞倫的等次呢？
文理和合譯本 - 昔民在利未人祭司職下受律、若由之而得完全、則何須別興一祭司依麥基洗德之班、而不謂之依亞倫班乎、
文理委辦譯本 - 昔民受律例時、利未子孫任祭司職、若人賴此、罔有缺乏、則毋庸別設一祭司、依麥基洗德班聯、不依亞倫班聯、
施約瑟淺文理新舊約聖經 - 昔民受律法、即在利未子孫得祭司職之時、若賴此祭司之職、能得成全、何用別設一祭司、循麥基洗德之等次、而不循亞倫之等次乎、又作人若賴利未子孫所得祭司之職能得成全何須別設一祭司循麥基洗德之等次而非循亞倫之等次乎民所受之律法與此祭司之職實有關係
吳經熊文理聖詠與新經全集 - 夫斯民之受律法也、乃在利未子孫為司祭之時。假使陳制而能躋人於純全之域、則何須復有異軍突起之司祭；而且此司祭何不與亞倫同一支派、而獨與麥基德同一班次耶？
Nueva Versión Internacional - Si hubiera sido posible alcanzar la perfección mediante el sacerdocio levítico (pues bajo este se le dio la ley al pueblo), ¿qué necesidad había de que más adelante surgiera otro sacerdote, según el orden de Melquisedec y no según el de Aarón?
현대인의 성경 - 하나님은 레위 계통의 제사장 직분에 근거하여 율법을 주셨습니다. 그런데 그 제사장 직무가 완전해질 수 있었다면 어째서 아론의 계통이 아닌 멜기세덱의 계통에서 다른 제사장을 세울 필요가 있었겠습니까?
Новый Русский Перевод - Если бы совершенство достигалось через священство левитов (а оно было существенной частью Закона, который был дан народу), то разве была бы нужда в другом священнике – по чину Мелхиседека, а не по чину Аарона?
Восточный перевод - Если бы цель Всевышнего достигалась через священство левитов (а оно было существенной частью Закона, который был дан народу), то разве была бы нужда в другом священнослужителе – подобном Малик-Цедеку, а не подобном Харуну?
Восточный перевод, версия с «Аллахом» - Если бы цель Аллаха достигалась через священство левитов (а оно было существенной частью Закона, который был дан народу), то разве была бы нужда в другом священнослужителе – подобном Малик-Цедеку, а не подобном Харуну?
Восточный перевод, версия для Таджикистана - Если бы цель Всевышнего достигалась через священство левитов (а оно было существенной частью Закона, который был дан народу), то разве была бы нужда в другом священнослужителе – подобном Малик-Цедеку, а не подобном Хоруну?
La Bible du Semeur 2015 - La Loi donnée au peuple d’Israël repose sur le sacerdoce lévitique. Or, s’il avait été possible d’atteindre la perfection par ce sacerdoce, pourquoi était-il nécessaire d’établir un autre prêtre, selon la ligne de Melchisédek, et non pas selon la ligne d’Aaron ?
リビングバイブル - もし、ユダヤ人の祭司と律法に私たちを救う力があるとしたら、なぜ神は、あえてアロンの位に等しい祭司〔ユダヤ人の祭司はすべてアロンの位を受け継いでいる〕ではなく、メルキゼデクの位に等しい祭司であるキリストをお立てになったのでしょうか。
Nestle Aland 28 - Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευιτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν, ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ’ αὐτῆς νενομοθέτηται, τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι;
unfoldingWord® Greek New Testament - εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευειτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν, ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ’ αὐτῆς νενομοθέτηται, τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ, ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα, καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι?
Nova Versão Internacional - Se fosse possível alcançar a perfeição por meio do sacerdócio levítico (visto que em sua vigência o povo recebeu a Lei), por que haveria ainda necessidade de se levantar outro sacerdote, segundo a ordem de Melquisedeque e não de Arão?
Hoffnung für alle - Das Priestertum der Leviten – und das Gesetz kennt nur dieses Priestertum – konnte uns offensichtlich nicht ans Ziel bringen und mit Gott versöhnen. Sonst hätte Gott doch nicht einen ganz anderen Priester vom Rang Melchisedeks zu uns schicken müssen. Dann hätte auch ein Priester vom Rang Aarons genügt.
Kinh Thánh Hiện Đại - Nếu công việc của các thầy tế lễ dòng họ Lê-vi đã hoàn hảo và có thể cứu rỗi chúng ta, sao phải cần một thầy tế lễ khác, theo dòng Mên-chi-xê-đéc chứ không theo dòng A-rôn, họ Lê-vi? Luật pháp ban hành cho người Do Thái được xây dựng trên chức quyền của thầy tế lễ.
พระคริสตธรรมคัมภีร์ไทย ฉบับอมตธรรมร่วมสมัย - หากมนุษย์มาถึงความครบถ้วนบริบูรณ์ในพระเจ้าได้โดยทางระบอบปุโรหิตตามแบบของเลวีแล้ว (เพราะโดยพื้นฐานของระบอบนี้บทบัญญัติจึงมีมาถึงเหล่าประชากร) ทำไมยังต้องมีปุโรหิตอีกผู้หนึ่งซึ่งเป็นปุโรหิตตามแบบของเมลคีเซเดค ไม่ใช่ตามแบบของอาโรน?
พระคัมภีร์ ฉบับแปลใหม่ - บรรดาปุโรหิตที่สืบเชื้อสายจากเผ่าเลวี เป็นรากฐานอันสำคัญส่วนหนึ่งของกฎบัญญัติ ที่ให้ไว้แก่ชาวอิสราเอล แต่ถ้าความเป็นปุโรหิตสามารถทำหน้าที่ได้อย่างเพียบพร้อมทุกประการแล้ว ก็ไม่จำเป็นต้องมีปุโรหิตอีกท่านมาปรากฏ เป็นปุโรหิตตามแบบอย่างเมลคีเซเดค ซึ่งไม่เหมือนกับปุโรหิตที่สืบเชื้อสายมาจากตระกูลอาโรน

交叉引用

Hebrews 6:20 - Jesus has entered there on our behalf as a forerunner, because he has become a high priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.
Galatians 4:9 - But now, since you know God, or rather have become known by God, how can you turn back again to the weak and worthless elements? Do you want to be enslaved to them all over again?
Hebrews 8:10 - For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will put my laws into their minds and write them on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people.
Hebrews 8:11 - And each person will not teach his fellow citizen, and each his brother or sister, saying, “Know the Lord,” because they will all know me, from the least to the greatest of them.
Hebrews 8:12 - For I will forgive their wrongdoing, and I will never again remember their sins.
Hebrews 8:13 - By saying a new covenant, he has declared that the first is obsolete. And what is obsolete and growing old is about to pass away.
Hebrews 5:10 - and he was declared by God a high priest according to the order of Melchizedek.
Hebrews 10:1 - Since the law has only a shadow of the good things to come, and not the reality itself of those things, it can never perfect the worshipers by the same sacrifices they continually offer year after year.
Hebrews 10:2 - Otherwise, wouldn’t they have stopped being offered, since the worshipers, purified once and for all, would no longer have any consciousness of sins?
Hebrews 10:3 - But in the sacrifices there is a reminder of sins year after year.
Hebrews 10:4 - For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.
Hebrews 7:21 - but he became a priest with an oath made by the one who said to him: The Lord has sworn and will not change his mind, “You are a priest forever.”
Hebrews 7:15 - And this becomes clearer if another priest like Melchizedek appears,
Colossians 2:10 - and you have been filled by him, who is the head over every ruler and authority.
Colossians 2:11 - You were also circumcised in him with a circumcision not done with hands, by putting off the body of flesh, in the circumcision of Christ,
Colossians 2:12 - when you were buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead.
Colossians 2:13 - And when you were dead in trespasses and in the uncircumcision of your flesh, he made you alive with him and forgave us all our trespasses.
Colossians 2:14 - He erased the certificate of debt, with its obligations, that was against us and opposed to us, and has taken it away by nailing it to the cross.
Colossians 2:15 - He disarmed the rulers and authorities and disgraced them publicly; he triumphed over them in him.
Colossians 2:16 - Therefore, don’t let anyone judge you in regard to food and drink or in the matter of a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day.
Colossians 2:17 - These are a shadow of what was to come; the substance is Christ.
Galatians 4:3 - In the same way we also, when we were children, were in slavery under the elements of the world.
Hebrews 7:17 - For it has been testified: You are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.
Hebrews 7:18 - So the previous command is annulled because it was weak and unprofitable
Hebrews 7:19 - (for the law perfected nothing), but a better hope is introduced, through which we draw near to God.
Hebrews 5:6 - also says in another place, You are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.
Galatians 2:21 - I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness comes through the law, then Christ died for nothing.
Hebrews 8:7 - For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no occasion for a second one.

逐节对照

交叉引用

Christian Standard Bible - Now if perfection came through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the law ), what further need was there for another priest to appear, said to be according to the order of Melchizedek and not according to the order of Aaron?
新标点和合本 - 从前百姓在利未人祭司职任以下受律法，倘若藉这职任能得完全，又何用另外兴起一位祭司，照麦基洗德的等次，不照亚伦的等次呢？
和合本2010（上帝版-简体） - 那么，如果百姓藉着利未人的祭司职任能达到完全—因为百姓是在这职分下领受律法的—为什么还需要按照麦基洗德的体系另外兴起一位祭司，而不按照亚伦的体系呢？
和合本2010（神版-简体） - 那么，如果百姓藉着利未人的祭司职任能达到完全—因为百姓是在这职分下领受律法的—为什么还需要按照麦基洗德的体系另外兴起一位祭司，而不按照亚伦的体系呢？
当代译本 - 以色列人在利未祭司制度的基础上承受律法，如果通过这个祭司制度可以达到纯全，又何必照麦基洗德的模式而不是亚伦的模式，另外兴起一位祭司呢？
圣经新译本 - 这样看来，如果藉着利未人的祭司制度能达到完全的地步（人民是在这制度下领受律法的），为什么还需要照着麦基洗德的体系，另外兴起一位祭司，而不照着亚伦的体系呢？
中文标准译本 - 既然如此，如果藉着利未人的祭司职份能达到完全——子民本来在这职份下领受了律法——那么，为什么还需要照着麦基洗德的等级，而不照着所谓“亚伦的等级”兴起另一位祭司呢？
现代标点和合本 - 从前百姓在利未人祭司职任以下受律法，倘若藉这职任能得完全，又何用另外兴起一位祭司，照麦基洗德的等次，不照亚伦的等次呢？
和合本（拼音版） - 从前百姓在利未人祭司职任以下受律法，倘若藉这职任能得完全，又何用另外兴起一位祭司，照麦基洗德的等次，不照亚伦的等次呢？
New International Version - If perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood—and indeed the law given to the people established that priesthood—why was there still need for another priest to come, one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron?
New International Reader's Version - The law that was given to the people called for the priestly system. That system began with Levi. Suppose the priestly system could have made people perfect. Then why was there still a need for another priest to come? And why did he need to be like Melchizedek? Why wasn’t he from Aaron’s family line?
English Standard Version - Now if perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need would there have been for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, rather than one named after the order of Aaron?
New Living Translation - So if the priesthood of Levi, on which the law was based, could have achieved the perfection God intended, why did God need to establish a different priesthood, with a priest in the order of Melchizedek instead of the order of Levi and Aaron?
The Message - If the priesthood of Levi and Aaron, which provided the framework for the giving of the law, could really make people perfect, there wouldn’t have been need for a new priesthood like that of Melchizedek. But since it didn’t get the job done, there was a change of priesthood, which brought with it a radical new kind of law. There is no way of understanding this in terms of the old Levitical priesthood, which is why there is nothing in Jesus’ family tree connecting him with that priestly line.
New American Standard Bible - So if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the Law), what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be designated according to the order of Aaron?
New King James Version - Therefore, if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be called according to the order of Aaron?
Amplified Bible - Now if perfection [a perfect fellowship between God and the worshiper] had been attained through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people were given the Law) what further need was there for another and different kind of priest to arise, one in the manner of Melchizedek, rather than one appointed to the order of Aaron?
American Standard Version - Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron?
King James Version - If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
New English Translation - So if perfection had in fact been possible through the Levitical priesthood – for on that basis the people received the law – what further need would there have been for another priest to arise, said to be in the order of Melchizedek and not in Aaron’s order?
World English Bible - Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
新標點和合本 - 從前百姓在利未人祭司職任以下受律法，倘若藉這職任能得完全，又何用另外興起一位祭司，照麥基洗德的等次，不照亞倫的等次呢？
和合本2010（上帝版-繁體） - 那麼，如果百姓藉着利未人的祭司職任能達到完全－因為百姓是在這職分下領受律法的－為甚麼還需要按照麥基洗德的體系另外興起一位祭司，而不按照亞倫的體系呢？
和合本2010（神版-繁體） - 那麼，如果百姓藉着利未人的祭司職任能達到完全—因為百姓是在這職分下領受律法的—為甚麼還需要按照麥基洗德的體系另外興起一位祭司，而不按照亞倫的體系呢？
當代譯本 - 以色列人在利未祭司制度的基礎上承受律法，如果通過這個祭司制度可以達到純全，又何必照麥基洗德的模式而不是亞倫的模式，另外興起一位祭司呢？
聖經新譯本 - 這樣看來，如果藉著利未人的祭司制度能達到完全的地步（人民是在這制度下領受律法的），為甚麼還需要照著麥基洗德的體系，另外興起一位祭司，而不照著亞倫的體系呢？
呂振中譯本 - 這樣看來，倘若藉着利未人的祭司職分能有完全勝任的資格（而人民之領受了律法倒是以這職分為基本），哪裏還需要另一種的一位祭司興起來、是照麥基洗德的等次、而不稱為照亞倫的等次呢？
中文標準譯本 - 既然如此，如果藉著利未人的祭司職份能達到完全——子民本來在這職份下領受了律法——那麼，為什麼還需要照著麥基洗德的等級，而不照著所謂「亞倫的等級」興起另一位祭司呢？
現代標點和合本 - 從前百姓在利未人祭司職任以下受律法，倘若藉這職任能得完全，又何用另外興起一位祭司，照麥基洗德的等次，不照亞倫的等次呢？
文理和合譯本 - 昔民在利未人祭司職下受律、若由之而得完全、則何須別興一祭司依麥基洗德之班、而不謂之依亞倫班乎、
文理委辦譯本 - 昔民受律例時、利未子孫任祭司職、若人賴此、罔有缺乏、則毋庸別設一祭司、依麥基洗德班聯、不依亞倫班聯、
施約瑟淺文理新舊約聖經 - 昔民受律法、即在利未子孫得祭司職之時、若賴此祭司之職、能得成全、何用別設一祭司、循麥基洗德之等次、而不循亞倫之等次乎、又作人若賴利未子孫所得祭司之職能得成全何須別設一祭司循麥基洗德之等次而非循亞倫之等次乎民所受之律法與此祭司之職實有關係
吳經熊文理聖詠與新經全集 - 夫斯民之受律法也、乃在利未子孫為司祭之時。假使陳制而能躋人於純全之域、則何須復有異軍突起之司祭；而且此司祭何不與亞倫同一支派、而獨與麥基德同一班次耶？
Nueva Versión Internacional - Si hubiera sido posible alcanzar la perfección mediante el sacerdocio levítico (pues bajo este se le dio la ley al pueblo), ¿qué necesidad había de que más adelante surgiera otro sacerdote, según el orden de Melquisedec y no según el de Aarón?
현대인의 성경 - 하나님은 레위 계통의 제사장 직분에 근거하여 율법을 주셨습니다. 그런데 그 제사장 직무가 완전해질 수 있었다면 어째서 아론의 계통이 아닌 멜기세덱의 계통에서 다른 제사장을 세울 필요가 있었겠습니까?
Новый Русский Перевод - Если бы совершенство достигалось через священство левитов (а оно было существенной частью Закона, который был дан народу), то разве была бы нужда в другом священнике – по чину Мелхиседека, а не по чину Аарона?
Восточный перевод - Если бы цель Всевышнего достигалась через священство левитов (а оно было существенной частью Закона, который был дан народу), то разве была бы нужда в другом священнослужителе – подобном Малик-Цедеку, а не подобном Харуну?
Восточный перевод, версия с «Аллахом» - Если бы цель Аллаха достигалась через священство левитов (а оно было существенной частью Закона, который был дан народу), то разве была бы нужда в другом священнослужителе – подобном Малик-Цедеку, а не подобном Харуну?
Восточный перевод, версия для Таджикистана - Если бы цель Всевышнего достигалась через священство левитов (а оно было существенной частью Закона, который был дан народу), то разве была бы нужда в другом священнослужителе – подобном Малик-Цедеку, а не подобном Хоруну?
La Bible du Semeur 2015 - La Loi donnée au peuple d’Israël repose sur le sacerdoce lévitique. Or, s’il avait été possible d’atteindre la perfection par ce sacerdoce, pourquoi était-il nécessaire d’établir un autre prêtre, selon la ligne de Melchisédek, et non pas selon la ligne d’Aaron ?
リビングバイブル - もし、ユダヤ人の祭司と律法に私たちを救う力があるとしたら、なぜ神は、あえてアロンの位に等しい祭司〔ユダヤ人の祭司はすべてアロンの位を受け継いでいる〕ではなく、メルキゼデクの位に等しい祭司であるキリストをお立てになったのでしょうか。
Nestle Aland 28 - Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευιτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν, ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ’ αὐτῆς νενομοθέτηται, τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι;
unfoldingWord® Greek New Testament - εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευειτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν, ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ’ αὐτῆς νενομοθέτηται, τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ, ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα, καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι?
Nova Versão Internacional - Se fosse possível alcançar a perfeição por meio do sacerdócio levítico (visto que em sua vigência o povo recebeu a Lei), por que haveria ainda necessidade de se levantar outro sacerdote, segundo a ordem de Melquisedeque e não de Arão?
Hoffnung für alle - Das Priestertum der Leviten – und das Gesetz kennt nur dieses Priestertum – konnte uns offensichtlich nicht ans Ziel bringen und mit Gott versöhnen. Sonst hätte Gott doch nicht einen ganz anderen Priester vom Rang Melchisedeks zu uns schicken müssen. Dann hätte auch ein Priester vom Rang Aarons genügt.
Kinh Thánh Hiện Đại - Nếu công việc của các thầy tế lễ dòng họ Lê-vi đã hoàn hảo và có thể cứu rỗi chúng ta, sao phải cần một thầy tế lễ khác, theo dòng Mên-chi-xê-đéc chứ không theo dòng A-rôn, họ Lê-vi? Luật pháp ban hành cho người Do Thái được xây dựng trên chức quyền của thầy tế lễ.
พระคริสตธรรมคัมภีร์ไทย ฉบับอมตธรรมร่วมสมัย - หากมนุษย์มาถึงความครบถ้วนบริบูรณ์ในพระเจ้าได้โดยทางระบอบปุโรหิตตามแบบของเลวีแล้ว (เพราะโดยพื้นฐานของระบอบนี้บทบัญญัติจึงมีมาถึงเหล่าประชากร) ทำไมยังต้องมีปุโรหิตอีกผู้หนึ่งซึ่งเป็นปุโรหิตตามแบบของเมลคีเซเดค ไม่ใช่ตามแบบของอาโรน?
พระคัมภีร์ ฉบับแปลใหม่ - บรรดาปุโรหิตที่สืบเชื้อสายจากเผ่าเลวี เป็นรากฐานอันสำคัญส่วนหนึ่งของกฎบัญญัติ ที่ให้ไว้แก่ชาวอิสราเอล แต่ถ้าความเป็นปุโรหิตสามารถทำหน้าที่ได้อย่างเพียบพร้อมทุกประการแล้ว ก็ไม่จำเป็นต้องมีปุโรหิตอีกท่านมาปรากฏ เป็นปุโรหิตตามแบบอย่างเมลคีเซเดค ซึ่งไม่เหมือนกับปุโรหิตที่สืบเชื้อสายมาจากตระกูลอาโรน

Hebrews 6:20 - Jesus has entered there on our behalf as a forerunner, because he has become a high priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.
Galatians 4:9 - But now, since you know God, or rather have become known by God, how can you turn back again to the weak and worthless elements? Do you want to be enslaved to them all over again?
Hebrews 8:10 - For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will put my laws into their minds and write them on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people.
Hebrews 8:11 - And each person will not teach his fellow citizen, and each his brother or sister, saying, “Know the Lord,” because they will all know me, from the least to the greatest of them.
Hebrews 8:12 - For I will forgive their wrongdoing, and I will never again remember their sins.
Hebrews 8:13 - By saying a new covenant, he has declared that the first is obsolete. And what is obsolete and growing old is about to pass away.
Hebrews 5:10 - and he was declared by God a high priest according to the order of Melchizedek.
Hebrews 10:1 - Since the law has only a shadow of the good things to come, and not the reality itself of those things, it can never perfect the worshipers by the same sacrifices they continually offer year after year.
Hebrews 10:2 - Otherwise, wouldn’t they have stopped being offered, since the worshipers, purified once and for all, would no longer have any consciousness of sins?
Hebrews 10:3 - But in the sacrifices there is a reminder of sins year after year.
Hebrews 10:4 - For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.
Hebrews 7:21 - but he became a priest with an oath made by the one who said to him: The Lord has sworn and will not change his mind, “You are a priest forever.”
Hebrews 7:15 - And this becomes clearer if another priest like Melchizedek appears,
Colossians 2:10 - and you have been filled by him, who is the head over every ruler and authority.
Colossians 2:11 - You were also circumcised in him with a circumcision not done with hands, by putting off the body of flesh, in the circumcision of Christ,
Colossians 2:12 - when you were buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead.
Colossians 2:13 - And when you were dead in trespasses and in the uncircumcision of your flesh, he made you alive with him and forgave us all our trespasses.
Colossians 2:14 - He erased the certificate of debt, with its obligations, that was against us and opposed to us, and has taken it away by nailing it to the cross.
Colossians 2:15 - He disarmed the rulers and authorities and disgraced them publicly; he triumphed over them in him.
Colossians 2:16 - Therefore, don’t let anyone judge you in regard to food and drink or in the matter of a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day.
Colossians 2:17 - These are a shadow of what was to come; the substance is Christ.
Galatians 4:3 - In the same way we also, when we were children, were in slavery under the elements of the world.
Hebrews 7:17 - For it has been testified: You are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.
Hebrews 7:18 - So the previous command is annulled because it was weak and unprofitable
Hebrews 7:19 - (for the law perfected nothing), but a better hope is introduced, through which we draw near to God.
Hebrews 5:6 - also says in another place, You are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.
Galatians 2:21 - I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness comes through the law, then Christ died for nothing.
Hebrews 8:7 - For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no occasion for a second one.