For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof.

先前的条例，因软弱无益，所以废掉了，

一方面，先前的诫命因软弱无能而废掉了，

一方面，先前的诫命因软弱无能而废掉了，

以前的条例由于本身的弱点和无益被废除了，

一方面，从前的条例因为软弱，没有用处，就废弃了；

原来，一方面，先前的条例因着本身的软弱和无用，就被废弃了，

先前的條例，因軟弱無益，所以廢掉了，

一方面，先前的誡命因軟弱無能而廢掉了，

一方面，先前的誡命因軟弱無能而廢掉了，

以前的條例由於本身的弱點和無益被廢除了，

一方面，從前的條例因為軟弱，沒有用處，就廢棄了；

這一來，一方面因規條之劣弱和無益，先前的條例就被廢掉（

原來，一方面，先前的條例因著本身的軟弱和無用，就被廢棄了，

夫前誡因荏弱無益而廢、

夫舊法無益、罔有功效、則遂廢弛、

前之法度、輕弱無益、故廢之、

是則舊制由於荏弱無能、而遭廢棄、

The former regulation is set aside because it was weak and useless

The old rule is set aside. It was weak and useless.

For on the one hand, a former commandment is set aside because of its weakness and uselessness

Yes, the old requirement about the priesthood was set aside because it was weak and useless.

So the previous command is annulled because it was weak and unprofitable

For, on the one hand, there is the nullification of a former commandment because of its weakness and uselessness

For on the one hand there is an annulling of the former commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness,

For there is a disannulling of a foregoing commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness

So the previous command is annulled because it was weak and unprofitable

On the one hand a former command is set aside because it is weak and useless,

For there is an annulling of a foregoing commandment because of its weakness and uselessness

For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:

And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.

But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage?

If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood,( for under it the people received the law,) what further need[ was there] that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope[ did]; by the which we draw nigh unto God.

For bodily exercise profiteth little: but godliness is profitable unto all things, having promise of the life that now is, and of that which is to come.

For if that first[ covenant] had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.For this[ is] the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest.For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.In that he saith, A new[ covenant], he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old[ is] ready to vanish away.

And this I say,[ that] the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.

For the law having a shadow of good things to come,[ and] not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.For then would they not have ceased to be offered? because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins.But in those[ sacrifices there is] a remembrance again[ made] of sins every year.For[ it is] not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.Wherefore when he cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body hast thou prepared me:In burnt offerings and[ sacrifices] for sin thou hast had no pleasure.Then said I, Lo, I come( in the volume of the book it is written of me,) to do thy will, O God.Above when he said, Sacrifice and offering and burnt offerings and[ offering] for sin thou wouldest not, neither hadst pleasure[ therein]; which are offered by the law;Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.

Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.

Be not carried about with divers and strange doctrines. For[ it is] a good thing that the heart be established with grace; not with meats, which have not profited them that have been occupied therein.

Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though[ it be] but a man’s covenant, yet[ if it be] confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto.

Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law?

Which[ was] a figure for the time then present, in which were offered both gifts and sacrifices, that could not make him that did the service perfect, as pertaining to the conscience;[ Which stood] only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed[ on them] until the time of reformation.